Skip to content

Compare the performance of Microsoft Copilot with other AI Language Models in a direct Intelligence Quotient assessment 💭

Large Language Model Microsoft Copilot Lags Behind, Ranking 25th Out of 26 Top Models in IQ Tests, Utilizing Questions Unseen Online.

Compare Microsoft Copilot's intelligence performance against other Language Model LMs in a direct...
Compare Microsoft Copilot's intelligence performance against other Language Model LMs in a direct IQ assessment 🧠

Compare the performance of Microsoft Copilot with other AI Language Models in a direct Intelligence Quotient assessment 💭

In the competitive world of AI, Microsoft's Copilot has been making waves as a consumer-friendly and "fun" alternative to other AI assistant apps like ChatGPT. However, when it comes to IQ-oriented AI challenges, Copilot seems to be lagging behind.

According to tests conducted by TrackingAI and reported on July 15, 2025, Copilot ranked 25th out of 26 models, scoring a 67 in an offline IQ test that used unique, non-public questions. This places Copilot at the bottom of the rankings, while the highest-scoring model, OpenAI o3 Pro, scored 117, and Elon Musk's Grok-4 reached 136 in a Mensa Norway IQ test where Copilot scored 84.

The reason for Copilot's lower IQ score lies in its GPT-4o model, which prioritizes versatility, speed, and cost-effectiveness over reasoning ability. Many of the models that outperformed Copilot are more powerful "pro" versions that are significantly more expensive to operate, while Copilot is offered free, reflecting a trade-off in performance versus accessibility.

Microsoft, however, focuses on making AI models more efficient and cost-effective, which affects Copilot's performance in high-difficulty IQ tests but benefits its integration and usability across Microsoft 365 and other ecosystems. Enhancements such as Context IQ, which provides intelligent assistance by suggesting relevant contextual data to improve task-specific output, exemplify how Copilot emphasizes practical productivity over raw IQ-like reasoning scores.

It's worth noting that Microsoft has been investing in new AI-focused data centers for Azure, indicating a focus on powering the future rather than being in the limelight for AI advancements. This approach may be a strategic move to compete effectively in the crowded AI arena, where players like Google Gemini, X's Grok, and OpenAI's ChatGPT frequently compete.

In summary, while Microsoft Copilot scores low in formal IQ-style AI benchmarks compared to many other large language models, this does not necessarily reflect its overall utility and strong integration within Microsoft products. Its design goals favor wide usability, cost-efficiency, and context-aware assistance rather than competing for the highest abstract reasoning scores in IQ tests.

  1. To improve Copilot's performance in complex IQ challenges, Microsoft is investing in new AI-focused data centers for Azure.
  2. Copilot's GPT-4o model prioritizes versatility, speed, and cost-effectiveness over reasoning ability, which impacts its performance in high-difficulty IQ tests.
  3. While Copilot may not rank high in formal IQ-style AI benchmarks like others, its design emphasizes practical productivity, usability, and cost-efficiency, especially within Microsoft 365 ecosystem.
  4. Despite Copilot's lower IQ score in tests, it offers updates for software on PC and as an app on Xbox platforms, benefiting from Microsoft's technology and integrations.

Read also:

    Latest