Large language models, such as this one, typically lack the capability for self-correction in their reasoning due to their reliance on input data and programming.
A new study by researchers from Google DeepMind and the University of Illinois has shed light on the challenges faced by large language models (LLMs) when it comes to self-correction of reasoning. The study, which was conducted across diverse reasoning tasks such as mathematical word problems, common sense reasoning, and open-domain question answering, found that current LLMs lack the competence for robust intrinsic self-correction of reasoning.
One of the core limitations is that LLMs cannot reliably verify or fix their own outputs without external guidance. Even though they can generate chain-of-thought or step-by-step reasoning, they do not have robust mechanisms for self-verification and self-correction of these reasoning chains. Techniques like the S2R method, which combine supervised fine-tuning with reinforcement learning (RL) on carefully curated data, have shown promising results in improving a model’s ability to self-verify and self-correct answers. However, these improvements require external training signals and feedback loops rather than being innate abilities of base LLMs.
Another limitation is the token output length limits, which hinder LLMs' ability to produce fully correct answers on complex tasks. For example, tasks requiring more than hundreds of thousands of reasoning steps exceed current output window sizes (e.g., 32K or 64K token limits). This creates a practical barrier to full reasoning rather than fundamental model limitations. Integrating external tools, such as code execution environments or scratchpads, can extend effective reasoning by breaking down tasks and offloading some steps externally.
The study also investigated more sophisticated self-correction techniques involving critique and debate between multiple LLM instances. However, the results showed that multi-agent debate, where multiple LLM instances critique each other's responses, only slightly outperformed self-consistency, and with more responses, self-consistency significantly outperformed multi-agent debate. A simpler self-consistency method, where multiple independent responses are generated and majority voting used to select the final answer, achieved 82.5% accuracy on GSM8K with 3 responses and 85.3% with 6 responses.
The authors of the study emphasize that self-correction should be approached with realistic expectations. LLMs rarely recognize flaws in their initial reasoning and may even alter initially correct responses to become incorrect after self-correction. The paper suggests that focusing more on enhancing initial prompts than relying on post-hoc self-correction could be more effective in improving LLM reasoning. Additionally, the paper suggests that leveraging external feedback could enhance reasoning capabilities in LLMs. This could be achieved through reinforcement learning techniques, latent action control methods, using external resources, and human-in-the-loop feedback or automated verifiers.
In conclusion, while current LLMs do not possess robust autonomous self-correction abilities, particularly in complex reasoning, combining supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement learning, latent action control, and external tool integration can substantially improve their reasoning and correction capabilities. However, it is crucial to manage expectations and focus on enhancing initial prompts and leveraging external feedback to achieve significant improvements in LLM reasoning.
[1] Brown et al., 2020. Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
[2] Raffel, et al., 2020. Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Model. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
[3] Khandelwal, et al., 2020. Generalized Self-Supervised Learning of Language. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
[5] Jia, et al., 2021. Scaling Prompt-Based Language Models Using Longer Training and Better Data. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
Artificial intelligence, namely large language models (LLMs), has limitations in self-correction, primarily reliant on external guidance to verify or fix outputs. However, techniques like the S2R method, combining supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning, show promise in improving self-verification and self-correction abilities. Technology, such as integrating external tools and latent action control, can extend the reasoning capabilities of LLMs, albeit with the need for realistic expectations and focusing on enhancing initial prompts.
