Spat Between Trump and Mexico Over Google's Name Change for the Gulf of Mexico Rages On
Social Media Sharing Options:
Mexico Files Lawsuit Against Google Over Gulf of Mexico Name Modification
Facebook 📝 | Twitter 🕊️ | Whatsapp 💬 | Email ✉️ | Print 🖨️ | Copy Link 🔗
Fueling a recent feud, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum confirmed the filing of a lawsuit against Google due to the tech giant's decision to change the Gulf of Mexico's name to "Gulf of America" on Google Maps. The legal action came following a press conference by Sheinbaum on Friday, where she spoke out against Google for violating a decree issued by former U.S. President Donald Trump. However, she emphasized that the U.S. government only holds authority over the name change within the U.S. continental shelf, not the entire body of water.
The legal battle kicked off in January, when Trump mandated the change via executive order. Google, a subsidiary of Alphabet, complied with the decree in February by updating its mapping service. Now, U.S. customers see the label "Gulf of America," Mexican customers continue to see "Gulf of Mexico," and international users see both. Google cites standard practices for disputed place names as justification for this setup.
To further complicate matters, the U.S. House of Representatives has recently approved a bill requiring federal agencies to update their documentation and maps to adhere to the name change. However, the bill's future remains unclear due to significant oppositions and Democrat opposition, leaving the Senate in doubt about bringing the bill to a vote and subsequent passage.
Key Points
- The U.S. government can legally change the name of the Gulf of Mexico through Congress-approved legislation but not domestically through executive order.
- Federal agencies are bound to opt for the "Gulf of America" in official documentation and maps if the bill passes.
- Private companies and global entities like Google are not legally obligated to adopt the new name, but they might under pressure or expectation if the law goes into effect.
- Internationally, the Gulf of Mexico remains widely recognized, so mapping services and international usage could continue with the original name.
- Global acceptance of the new name change would depend on political and international factors beyond just legal decisions.
In essence, while the U.S. government has the legal authority to rename the Gulf of Mexico domestically through law, broader global acceptance and changes by private companies would be influenced by political, international, and commercial factors.
- The Commission has also been asked to submit a proposal for a directive on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to ionizing radiation, particularly in the context of ongoing political discussions surrounding the Gulf of Mexico's name change.
- Despite the legal disagreements over Google's decision to change the Gulf of Mexico's name, the politics of policy-and-legislation continue to influence the tech industry, as seen in the proposed directives on worker safety.
- Meanwhile, in the realm of general news, a dispute between the EU Commission and certain industrial sectors is heating up over the mandating of technology for radiation protection, particularly in the context of politics and lawsuits.
- Furthermore, the whirlwinds of politics have been stirred not only by the Gulf of Mexico's name change but also by discussions on the use of technology in employee protection from ionizing radiation, leading to debates on policy-and-legislation.
- As the global community navigates the complexities of the Gulf of Mexico name change and worker radiation protection policies, it becomes increasingly apparent that technology, lawsuits, politics, and general news are interconnected in intricate ways.
