Online Judgment by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) Favors Check24: Assessing Insurance Rates Online Approved

The ECJ Rules in Favor of Check24: Diving into Insurance Comparison Services as a Legitimate Assistance

Online Comparison of Insurance Rates Upheld by ECJ: Check24 triumphs in court decision - Online Judgment by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) Favors Check24: Assessing Insurance Rates Online Approved

So, you're curious about the recent European Court of Justice (ECJ) decision regarding Check24's insurance comparison platform? Let's dive in!

In the lawsuit between insurance group Huk-Coburg and Check24, the latter provides an online service that compares insurance offers based on various criteria and assigns grades. Huk-Coburg viewed this grading as an impermissible form of comparative advertising.

Now, honestly, under EU law, comparative advertising is allowed under specific conditions. The question at hand: can these conditions be met in a grading or points system? The Munich I Regional Court couldn't decide that directly, so they called on the ECJ for an answer.

Now, here's the interesting part. Instead of answering the question straight-up, the ECJ took a step back and examined whether an online comparison service can even be considered comparative advertising. This depends on whether the provider can be considered a competitor of the insurance company.

After checking out the case file, the ECJ assessed that Check24 isn't an insurance company itself. Instead, Check24 simply compares tariffs and mediates contracts with insurers. Since Check24 isn't actively providing insurance services like Huk-Coburg, it's safe to assume that they're not part of the same service market.

Now, the Munich court needs to make a decision on the specific lawsuit, but they've got the ECJ's assessment to consider. The ECJ's decision suggests that Check24's service is more about providing a comparison platform and aiding consumers in making informed decisions rather than promoting its own offerings directly.

In essence, Check24 - unlike comparative advertising - does not specifically aim to promote its own product over others. Instead, it offers valuable aid in helping consumers sift through the insurance market and make educated decisions. Good for them, eh?

Sources:1. European Court of Justice (2022). Case C-286/20 Huk-Coburg Versicherungen and Check24 AG. Available online: https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2022-07/cp220294en.pdf2. Expert Platform (2022). Insurance Comparison Services: Check24's Grading System and Its Impact on Comparative Advertising. Available online: https://expertplatform.com/insurance-news/insurance-comparison-services-check24s-grading-system-and-its-impact-on-comparative-advertising/

1. Despite initial concerns about the grading system used by Check24, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has deemed it a legitimate assistance for consumers, as it operates under the parameters of EU law for comparative advertising.
2. In the case between Huk-Coburg and Check24, the ECJ determined that Check24 is not a competitor of insurance companies in the traditional sense, but rather a provider of an online comparison platform aiding clients in making informed insurance decisions.
3. The ECJ's decision is significant for the insurance industry and the realm of business technology, as it clarifies that assists like insurance comparison services can be considered beneficial tools rather than direct promotional activities, like comparative advertising.
4. Furthermore, the ruling highlights how Community law fosters fair competition among various financial sectors, such as insurance, by enabling platforms like Check24 to offer valuable services that help consumers navigate complex markets while respecting the legal boundaries set forth by the EU.

Read also: