Suggestions Regarding Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence Models under the AI Act, Submitted to the European AI Agency
Fresh Perspective
The Center for Data Innovation tossed their two cents into the mix regarding the European AI Office's (AIO) consultation on the AI Act's Code of Practice. This, my friend, isn't a casual chat!
Here are the six big suggestions they've thrown out there:
- Clear as Mud: The AIO should make info on the AI value chain more transparent by disclosing different levels of details, keep it simple, cap'n!
- Legal Harmony: The Code of Practice should vibe with laws that are already in place in various sectors. Why reinvent the wheel, right?
- International Insights: The AIO should tap into the brains of the global AI community for help identifying and assessing risks. Sharing knowledge is key!
- Speculative vs Real: The AIO should draw a line between real risks and potential ones when defining the obligations for GPAI providers. Let's not freak out about ghosts!
- Hype the AI: Innovation and adoption of AI should be a top priority. The Code should focus on encouraging progress!
- Adaptability: The AIO should work on the Code iteratively, making changes as needed, and ensuring it's technically possible. No one likes outdated tech!
To get the juicy details, I'd suggest checking out the Center for Data Innovation's official documents or correspondence with the AIO. But until then, these are the basics!
- The Center for Data Innovation emphasizes the significance of fostering innovation and adoption of artificial intelligence in the AI Act's Code of Practice, advocating for a focus that ensures technological progress.
- In the AI Act's Code of Practice, the Center for Data Innovation proposes the integration of artificial intelligence’s development with existing laws, highlighting the importance of leveraging data and technology in a manner that adapts to emerging AI advancements while maintaining legal harmony.
